| The Checkered Flag |
 |
|
Ordinarily, budget action is completed by June. But
this year, June became July... then summer became
fall... Just when the state was beginning to think a
bonding package may never be agreed upon, two
days shy of November, the legislature finally
passed a
bonding bill. And this time around, it's a bonding
package that the Governor has vowed to sign.
Debates on affordability and legislative oversights led
to months of negotiations and a potential lawsuit on
behalf of many Connecticut towns. On October 9,
Governor Rell vetoed the legislature's $3.2 billion
bonding package stating that it was unaffordable for
the people of Connecticut. "The time has come for the
state of Connecticut to live within its means,"
Rell
wrote in her veto statement.
The super majority's plans to override the
Governor's
veto were hampered by one of their own, Senator
Joan
Hartley (D-Waterbury). The vetoed bonding bill
included $950 million for Connecticut universities, but
failed to include language that allowed for proper
legislative oversight of that allocation. Because of this,
Hartley, the last vote needed for the override, refused
to vote with her Democratic colleagues.
After being forced into further negotiations, on October
30, the House and Senate unanimously approved
a
$2.8 billion bond package. The final bill
contained
language that provided for independent oversight and
annual audits for the Connecticut university allocation.
It also included $2 million to reimburse any towns that
need financing because of the state's delays.
Just as the dust settles on the bonding issue, there is
already talk within the Legislative Office Building that
another special session may be convened to address
the AT&T cable issue. So far, there are only rumors,
and all indications are that the 2007 legislative
session has finally come to an end and that all eyes
are on 2008.
|
| Election Day - November 6 |
 |
|
It's hard to believe that Election Day is almost here!
Only four more days until 131 towns across
Connecticut get out the vote for mayor, first
selectman, and other municipal offices. That's just
enough time to get the scoop on a few more
municipal races!
Bridgeport
Following his loss to State Senator Bill Finch
in the Democratic mayoral primary in Bridgeport,
State Rep. Chris Caruso filed a lawsuit to
challenge the election results. During the week-long
hearing, Caruso's lawyer outlined 22 alleged
violations of election law during the primary voting.
Caruso asserted that this fraud or abuse by city
officials during the primary tainted the outcome of the
election. Caruso lost the primary by 270 votes.
Superior Court Judge John Blawie dismissed
Caruso's lawsuit in a 20-page decision. "Political
contests inherently produce strong emotions on both
sides," the judge wrote. "This primary was no
exception, compounded by the fact that this was the
first election using the new paper ballot system and
optical-scan voting technology, all under time
constraints." The judge acknowledged that it
was "possible" that some aspects of the primary may
not have been as well managed as possible, but held
that the inconsistencies cited were not enough to
overturn the election results.
Finch will now be up against Republican candidate
Michael Garrett and several third party
candidates in Tuesday's election.
Waterbury
The Democratic candidate for mayor in Waterbury,
third term incumbent Michael Jarjura, is also
a former state representative. The Republican
candidate is current State Rep. Tony
D'Amelio. Yet it seems to be Independent
candidate, Alderman Dennis Odle, who is
making the most waves in Waterbury.
Odle became the Independent candidate after losing
the Republican primary to D'Amelio. Odle created
controversy after his campaign ran a full-page ad in a
free, monthly tabloid in Waterbury that accused Mayor
Jarjura of spending more time on his personal
business than city issues. The ad included seven
allegations of how Jarjura has abused his power.
The running of the ad caused backlash from all
sides. "I just feel he's being misled and taken by the
Independents, their style and their platform and
running with it," said D'Amelio, "It's just bashing."
Jarjura also responded to the attack, "I knew Dennis
would have to compromise his principals to some
degree when he joined the Independent party. I
guess I didn't anticipate how far he would have to go."
Odle said that the ad was printed in error. He
explained that questioning Jarjura's business
dealings is fair game in a campaign, but that the
campaign would source all allegations in the future.
It's not often that two competing major party
candidates agree on something so close to an
election, but this incident appears to have caused the
improbable. Just a few more days until we see how
this may affect the election.
New Britain
Republican Mayor Tim Stewart has also been
the center of controversy. A conversation between
Stewart and dispatch over flooding issues in the city
back in October 2005 was recently posted on
YouTube. In the recording, Stewart uses profane
terms to describe an irate woman who called him to
complain about the flooding, and firefighters and other
city workers handling the flooding.
Stewart believes that the tape was obtained by the
local firefighters union, with which he has an
estranged relationship as a former firefighter. The
union denies any involvement. "In crisis situations,
people say a lot of things and we regret what we say
from time to time, but I didn't use it in a way that was
harmful to anyone in anyway," Stewart said.
Stewart's Democratic opponent, Alderman Jim
Wyskiewicz, also denied any involvement with the
tape, but added, "It's appalling. It's shocking. I think
the tape speaks for itself."
Despite the bad press, Stewart still seems to be a
contender for reelection. According to the Mayor's
spokesman, Pete Steele, of the 250 people that
attending one of Stewart's recent fundraisers, about
half of them were Democrats. With Democrats
boasting a 4-to-1 majority in New Britain, Steele
said, "You don't get elected without them." This race
may still be up for grabs.
West Haven
There's a ton of buzz coming out of the West Haven
race for mayor. One term incumbent, Mayor John
Picard, who beat former Republican mayor Richie
Borer, is now facing a last minute contender -
Dorinda Boer, wife of the former mayor! It's a
battle. The fight is all over economic development and
increasing the city's tax base through a large
development. It should be an interesting final week.
Simsbury
Former chief of staff to Lt. Governor Kevin Sullivan and
former first selectperson for the town, Mary
Glassman, is at it again! She's challenging
Republican incumbent Thomas Vincent for
the chance to return to a job she held from 1991 to
1999. After running for Lt. Governor last fall, Glassman
found she still enjoyed the ups and down of elected
office. She's decided that the best way to serve
people is to take back the reins in her adopted home
town. Glassman even hit the air waves this week on
the powerhouse radio station WTIC 1080 to bring her
campaign message to the voters. This is one to
watch.
For more information on the mayoral, first selectmen,
and other top office candidates in your town, please
click the link below. And if you live in any of the 131
towns holding elections, go try out the new optical
scanner voting machines next Tuesday,
November 6!
|
| Participate in the In the Loop feedback survey! |
 |
|
If you haven't already, there's still time to take the In
the Loop feedback survey! Tell us what you like
and how we can add value to the newsletter. Thank
you in advance for taking the time to participate in our
survey. We value your input.
|
|
Confessions of a Freshman |
|
|
|
by William Tong
As a freshman legislator, I should probably be
frustrated by the process, or the gridlock, or the
struggle to get things done. Or maybe just by my low
standing in the Chamber. But I'm not. I've been
surprised, in fact, to discover that being productive and
effective is largely a matter of effort. What is most
frustrating, on the other hand, are the labels and
assumptions we have to overcome to begin working
at all. Me Democrat. You Republican. Liberal.
Conservative. Moderate. Politician. That last
label is the worst of all. Because I chose to run for
office and to serve, colleagues or constituents can
sometimes make negative assumptions about my
motivations, my judgment, my effectiveness, and
worst, my integrity.
This leads to a very real embarrassment, at times,
about politics and public service, which last time I
checked, is not something we should be ashamed of.
(It's even worse than the other label I wear every day -
lawyer!). Make no mistake - I am a strong and
committed Democrat. I believe in the power of
government and the law to ensure legal, economic
and social justice where the free market fails, and that
strong leadership can effectively manage and deliver
public goods. I strongly believe there are very real
differences between the major parties. But more often
than not, party-affiliation proves too much, and labels
and false assumptions can kill a productive
conversation, or worse, prevent people from talking at
all.
I can tell you that it can be different. In my first hearing
on the Judiciary Committee, I sat right next to the
leadership. I suppose I did this to be close to Andrew
McDonald and Gerry Fox so they could stop me if I had
the sudden urge to say something that could end my
career before it started. The seat to my right was
empty at the start of the meeting, reserved for the
Republican Ranking Member, State Representative
Arthur O'Neill. Shortly after the meeting started, Art
came in quietly and sat down. He lost his mother that
very afternoon, after a long illness. But he was there,
doing his job. His grief was palpable, quiet but severe,
and for the rest of the hearing I could only wonder how
much strength and commitment it took for him to be
there and to fulfill his responsibility. The first thing I
knew about him was the depth of his humanity and
commitment, and that was really all I could see. The
fact that he was a Republican, or a Ranking Member,
or maybe an adversary, seemed to be of very little
value. I am certain that is a major reason why he and I
were able to work so well together to pass landmark
gun control legislation this session, a bill he had
worked hard to defeat in the past.
In my experience, it's a pretty short hop over the party-
affiliation wall to find a safe place to talk. It's even
shorter within one's own party. So as we begin our
conversation on this blog, I hope we'll work together to
develop a shared vision of progressive leadership that
transcends labels and assumptions. Not by simply
conceding a point or two, but by respecting, hearing,
and trying to understand one another. I hope we'll
develop a kind of leadership that begins where Art and
I started - as two decent and honorable human
beings, doing our best to find pragmatic solutions and
advance our state and its people as honestly,
cooperatively and as capably as we can.
This article has been reprinted courtesy of the author,
State Representative William Tong. It was originally
printed as a blog entry on www.danmalloy.com on
October 25, 2007.
|
|