| Third time's a charm? |
 |
|
In early April, the small band of Republican legislators
introduced a budget plan that boasted not raising
taxes due to the current and projected budget
surplus. The Democrats on the other hand introduced
a "Perfect Budget Package" that increased the income
tax for the wealthiest 5% of Connecticut's residents
and provided tax cuts for the other 95%. The
Democratic proposal even contained an earned
income tax credit for Connecticut's most needy
citizens. Nonetheless, no budget was adopted by
the end of regular session at midnight of June 6.
When the dust settled during the first special session
in the month of June, the final budget package
agreed upon contained no progressive income
tax and no earned income tax credit, and the
legislature failed to cut gasoline taxes. The
legislature even failed to cap the gross receipts tax for
petroleum products. On the contrary, the price of
gasoline is due to go up by a few cents beginning July
1.
The legislature was successful in several
areas such as increasing Medicaid reimbursements
for many healthcare providers, increasing statutory
formula grants for all municipalities, and significantly
increasing education spending. The budget was no
longer a Democratic or Republican budget, but
instead a compromise budget in which
everyone got a little. However, every legislator was
looking for a lot more.
This brings us to the second special session.
With every budget comes the implementer
bills that go along with it. These bills contain all
the vital language needed to implement the
allocations made in the budget. It was understood
from the beginning that the Governor would not sign
the budget until the final versions of the implementers
were placed on her desk for review. Possible
additions were "shopped around" every caucus to get
their sign off before any particular proposal could be
added. This process essentially killed most of the
innovative ideas that might usually have been added
in past years and kept the budget implementers
exactly that - items that support the budget and
nothing else!
Historically, so called "rats," or pieces of unrelated
legislation, tended to make their way into these
lengthy bills. Even now, the implementers are the
compilation of 50 to 70 bills all rolled into one.
This time around every caucus approved of the bills
beforehand so very few surprises were found hiding
between the lines.
To date, the bonding package and transportation
implementer are still left on the table to negotiate.
It is predicted that when the veto session convenes in
July, legislators will also return to take action on these
two remaining issues. There are millions of dollars on
the table for each one of these proposals so you can
bet that no one - state agencies, mayors, legislators,
or lobbyists - will be relaxing until the final vote is
taken. These proposals will allocate millions of
dollars to towns to build bridges, roads, school
expansions, and library additions. In addition,
several "pet projects" for legislators and the Governor
are included in the bond package creating a few more
weeks of tense deliberations and last minute
maneuvers by all to have language added or
removed.
With a fiscally conservative governor and the watch
dog "Fighting Forty-Four" (aka the House
Republicans) at work, it will be interesting to see how
many of the traditional "hometown" projects will get
authorized this session. In any case, CT taxpayers
should know they are certainly getting their value out of
the CT part-time legislature this session!
|
| One little, two little, three little vetoes...four little, five little vetoes now |
 |
|
Governor Rell issued her fifth veto this week. This
time it was on HB 5656 AAC Access to Post
Secondary Education, another controversial issue.
This bill would have provided in-state tuition rates
for illegal immigrants at state colleges and
universities in Connecticut. Ten states already have
such legislation including California, Texas, and New
York.
Debate went on for around three hours in both the
House and the Senate when this bill came up. Some
legislators offered examples of people they know who
were illegal immigrants when they entered the U.S. as
children with their parents, but still succeeded here
because they had access to a great education.
Others pointed out the benefits of enrolling students
who may otherwise drop out of school when they can't
afford college tuition. "[These students] are
Connecticut residents and are American in every
way, except for the circumstances of their
childhood. They should not have to suffer for a
decision that their parents made very long ago," said
Senate Majority Leader Martin Looney.
However, much of the debate surrounded the
discrepancy created between state and Federal law if
this bill was signed. The bill would require that
students live in CT and be a graduate of an in-
state high school. It would also require that students
sign an affidavit stating that they would try to become a
legal citizen. In her veto message, Governor Rell
pointed out, "The requirement that students file an
application to legalize their status would in essence
be notification to the government that they're here
illegally, and it would greatly increase the
likelihood that they would be deported."
Senator Dan Debicella (R - Shelton), an opponent of
the bill, also argued that the state's limited resources
should go to legal residents. With 200 to 250
students being eligible for lower tuition this year under
the bill, Debicella pointed out that that would cost the
state $2 million in lost revenue.
The bill passed the House by a vote of 77-68 and
passed the Senate by 21-15. None of the Republican
legislators voted for the measure. Because of the
close vote, it doesn't seem likely that the Democrats
will be able to override the Governor's veto. "I
understand these students are not responsible for
their undocumented status, having come to the United
States with their parents," Governor Rell said. "The
fact remains, however, that these students and their
parents are here illegally, and neither sympathy nor
good intentions can ameliorate that fact." Looks like
the fifth veto will stick, but Senator Looney has already
vowed to revisit this issue next session.
|
| Newly passed legislation |
 |
|
According to the joint rules of the legislature, after a
bill is passed by both the House and Senate during
session, the Governor has 5 calendar days, exclusive
of Sundays and holidays, from when a bill is
presented to sign or veto the bill. After session has
adjourned, the bill becomes a law unless the
Governor vetoes the bill within 15 calendar days after
presentment. It takes at least 2/3 of the members of
each house to override the Governor's veto. The
Democrats currently have the numbers to do so in
both chambers.
As the House and Senate pass bills, S&L will
continue to post the bills that are of interest to our
clients that have been signed into law and become
public acts (PA) or special acts (SA), or vetoed, by
Governor Rell. For a list of bills passed, but not yet
acted upon by the Governor, please click the link
below.
The Governor signed the following special session
bills:
HB 8001 AN ACT CONCERNING THE STATE
BUDGET FOR THE BIENNIUM ENDING JUNE 30,
2009 AND MAKING APPROPRIATIONS
THEREFOR
HB 8002 AN ACT IMPLEMENTING THE PROVISIONS
OF THE BUDGET CONCERNING HUMAN SERVICES
AND PUBLIC HEALTH
HB 8003 AN ACT IMPLEMENTING THE PROVISIONS
OF THE BUDGET CONCERNING EDUCATION
The Governor signed the following regular session
bills:
PA 07-131 (HB 7275) AN ACT CONCERNING THE
FACE OF CONNECTICUT
PA 07-132 (SB 1184) AN ACT CONCERNING THE
PRESIDENTIAL PREFERENCE PRIMARY
PA 07-141 (SB 167) AN ACT REVISING THE
PROCESS FOR THE TAKING OF REAL PROPERTY
BY MUNICIPALITIES FOR REDEVELOPMENT AND
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND REVISING THE
PROCESS FOR PROVIDING RELOCATION
ASSISTANCE FOR OUTDOOR ADVERTISING
STRUCTURES ACQUIRED BY THE COMMISSIONER
OF TRANSPORTATION
PA 07-144 (HB 7043) AN ACT CONCERNING OFF-
TRACK BETTING BRANCH FACILITIES AND BINGO
PRIZES
PA 07-145 (HB 7138) AN ACT CONCERNING
MANUFACTURER PERMITS FOR BREW PUBS
PA 07-146 (HB 7141) AN ACT CONCERNING
UNIVERSITY BEER, WINE AND LIQUOR
PERMITS
PA 07-149 (SB 1145) AN ACT CONCERNING
REVISIONS TO OFFICE OF HEALTH CARE ACCESS
STATUTES
PA 07-152 (HB 6209) AN ACT CONCERNING THE
RENEWABLE ENERGY INVESTMENT FUND
PA 07-154 (HB 6856) AN ACT CONCERNING A
MUNICIPAL STORMWATER AUTHORITY PILOT
PROGRAM, SPECIAL SERVICES DISTRICTS, CLEAN
WATER FUND DISBURSEMENTS AND THE
DEFINITION OF UNIMPROVED LAND FOR TAX
PURPOSES
PA 07-155 (HB 6893) AN ACT CONCERNING
EXPANDED OUTREACH AND COMMUNICATION
ACTIVITIES BY THE CHOICES HEALTH INSURANCE
ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
PA 07-167 (SB 1400) AN ACT CONCERNING THE
ADMINISTRATION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR
VEHICLES
PA 07-169 (SB 1047) AN ACT CONCERNING THE
CONNECTICUT UNIFORM TRANSFERS TO MINORS
ACT
PA 07-172 (HB 5179) AN ACT REQUIRING
MARKETABLE TITLE BE PROVIDED FOR MOTOR
VEHICLES SOLD AT AUCTION
The Governor vetoed the following bill:
PA 07-135 (HB 5656) AN ACT CONCERNING
ACCESS TO POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION
|
|
Budget Buzz |
|
|
|
With legislators' overlapping vacation schedules and
negotiations for the bond package and the
transportation bill about to begin, the special session
process has been dragging on and, it appears, on.
The legislature did make a huge step forward earlier
this week by finally passing the two-year, $36
billion state budget package along with two
implementer bills designed to outline how those
funds should be spent by state agencies.
After weeks of backroom negotiations to get things to
a place that everyone could live with, discussion on
the chamber floors was minimal. Republican
legislators put their concerns on the record regarding
the 8.6 percent increase in spending in the first year
while other members remarked about the remaining
issues that still need closure. As leaders thanked
everyone for their hard work and called for a roll call
vote, they also reminded members to stay tuned for
the exact timing of the final-final-final budget session.
The House passed the budget with a vote of 134 - 5.
The 5 dissenting votes were all Democrats.
One of those Representatives, James Spallone of
Essex, explained that he voted against the budget
because his town received a small aid increase
compared to other municipalities. Total grant
payments to municipalities rose by more than $221
million with this budget.
The Senate passed the budget with a vote of 33-1.
That sole nay vote belonged to Republican
Sam Caligiuri of Waterbury. Caligiuri admitted that the
budget was the best product that all parties could
agree on considering the circumstances. However,
he still voted no because, "Fundamentally, I don't
believe the level of spending can be sustained without
significant spending cuts or raising taxes."
Overall, the compromised budget still includes
historic amounts of funding for education and health
care. It exceeds the spending cap by $690.4
million in fiscal year 2008, but is projected to be
under the cap by approximately $29 million in fiscal
year 2009. Through the use of surplus funds, the
legislature was able to target investments into
some "favorite" programs. Many wonder exactly what
will happen to those programs if the economy slows
and the surplus begins to look more like a deficit.
Governor Rell signed the budget on Tuesday with just
four days to spare before the new fiscal year begins
on July 1.
As we noted, special session '07 isn't over quite yet.
The legislature looks like it plans to return for an
encore sometime after the 4th of July break.
With
a slow week anticipated and the 4th of July on
Wednesday, we'll be taking a break from the weekly
newsletter next week. We will return on July 13 to bring
you the latest buzz from the Capitol and the lowdown
on what to expect in the remainder of special session.
Enjoy the summer weather - stay cool!
|
|