| Still on the top of the heap! |
 |
|
Even after a budget battle with the Democrats and
taking some heat on increasing the states income tax
from not only her own party, but also a good number of
the independent voters, Governor Rell is standing tall
with the people of Connecticut according to the
newest Quinnipiac University Poll. Overall, 69% of
CT voters approve of the job Rell is doing. That
number is down from 72% approval back in February,
but is still remarkable as one of the highest
approval ratings for any Governor in the
country. "It's the longest political honeymoon I've
ever seen," said Quinnipiac University Poll Director
Douglas Schwartz.
Interestingly, the drop in approval ratings came more
from Republicans than Democrats. Sixty-seven
percent of Democrats approve of the job the Governor
is doing, only a 1% drop from February. However, the
Republican approval rating fell 7%, although to a still
high 71%. Schwartz attributed the Republican drop to
conservative Republicans that were unhappy with the
Governor's income tax proposal.
The legislature's approval is 45%, a slight dip
from 47% back in February. As might be
expected with a Democratic majority in both chambers
of the General Assembly, 55% of Democratic voters
approve of the way the state legislature is handling its
job compared to only 41% of Republicans.
Voters also weighed in on the budget plans put out by
the Govenor, the Democrats, and the Republicans, as
well as various tax issues. Some of the results could
be expected - nobody really likes to pay taxes - but
some were a bit more surprising.
Despite the Governor's vast approval rating, she
wasn't the winner when it came to favorable budget
proposals. Voters preferred Republicans' no tax
hike budget plan with 41% of the vote, compared
to 33% for the Democrats' proposal to raise income
taxes for higher income individuals, and just 16%
for Rell's plan to increase the state income tax to pay
for education.
Republican leaders hailed this outcome as proof that
people understand that the Democrats' tax cuts
for "90% of taxpayers" are not legit and that a no tax
increase budget is possible. Assistant Senate
Minority Leader John McKinney was adamant that
more and more people are leaving CT or spending
most of the year in another state to get away from the
high taxes. "People are voting with their feet,"
he explained, "CT is one of 2 states losing
population." McKinney, Senate Minority Leader
DeLuca, and House Minority Leader Cafero all
expressed that they believe that this poll would drive
debate to control spending and increase the
likelihood that a budget will come out without a tax
increase. "[Williams will] dismiss this poll at his
peril," stated Cafero.
But in yet another spin, while voters prefer a no tax
hike package, when examining taxes individually, 50%
of voters say they would pay higher income taxes to
provide health insurance for more people and 49%
said the same for education. Looks like there are
some mixed signals being sent out and none of the
approval ratings for any of the tax proposals are by any
means a mandate. Legislators have 17 days
to decide if any of this information is valuable
enough to consider and what impact it will have on a
two-year spending plan.
|
| Nothing is what it seems... or is it? |
 |
|
The first few days of the legislative session always
entails the time honored tradition of adopting rules of
the joint rules for the two year session. These rules
have been historically accepted and adhered to by
both parties - Republicans and Democrats alike.
Recently, the 2007 legislative session has proven that
just maybe some rules really are meant to be used to
turn a defeat into a victory!
Rule #15 has seen quite the workout since the
beginning of session. Most members of the General
Assembly, as well as the public, don't pay much
attention to the long detailed rule of engagement until
they need to figure out how to get a particular issue
back on track. If you walked around the LOB next week
and took a survey on what does Rule #15 say, you
might get answers like: Can't steal a base in
Fenway Park? or Won't allow the Whalers to
return to Hartford? or maybe Oh yeah, that's the
one that says UConn men's basketball teams get an
automatic berth at this year's NCAA championships!
The truth is Rule #15 really allows the Speaker of the
House and the President of the Senate to resurrect a
bill that failed to be acted upon by a committee. It also
allows the Speaker of the House and the President of
the Senate to certify in writing that if a bill is not yet in
file copy, that they can move it onto the floor for debate
as long as a copy of the bill with a fiscal note is on the
desks of all members prior to taking action. These are
big changes on how bills make it through the
process. Several bills this session have been
resurrected by the application of Rule #15, essentially
taking away any leverage of a committee chair or the
Republican members of the committee. The power of
filibustering during a tight committee deadline all but
evaporated!
But not to be out foxed, the opponents of a particular
bill still have several options up their sleeves if they
really are out to kill a particular bill. They can file
enough amendments in the House to chew up
valuable debate time and force a bill to be tabled, they
can file multiple amendments to hold up the bill from
being considered for debate, or they can "stake out" a
committee where the unpopular bill has been sent on
a referral and kill it there.
With such quick turn around comes confusion and as
a result, often attendance at committee meetings is
sparse. A well orchestrated effort by opposing
members can use attendance to their advantage to
catch the supporters off guard. In this situation, it is
the number of votes present that matters, not
the makeup of the committee, and often the votes are
not kept open all day since the committee meets
immediately before session begins. But, so far this
session, it doesn't seem like the "sneak attack" has
been employed.
Because of the potential usage of Rule #15, nothing
will be as it seems. Bills that were dead by an
intentional lack of action can be brought back to life by
seasoned lobbyists and "rule savvy" legislators that
understand that knowing the rules is sometimes
better than having the votes!
Still ahead for the House and Senate is the big stuff:
universal health care, tackling escalating gas prices,
curbing electric rates, same sex marriage, the
expansion of the bottle bill, and CT's two-year tax and
spending plan. With 17 working days left and lots of
long hours of negotiating ahead, many in the Capitol
are seeing long, long days ahead before this session
of the General Assembly will officially be over.
|
| Newly passed legislation |
 |
|
According to the joint rules of the legislature, after a
bill
is passed by both the House and Senate during
session, the Governor has 5 calendar days, exclusive
of Sundays and holidays, from when a bill is
presented to sign or veto the bill. After session has
adjourned, the bill becomes a law unless the
Governor vetoes the bill within 15 calendar days after
presentment. It takes at least 2/3 of the members of
each house to override the Governor's veto. The
Democrats currently have the numbers to do so in
both chambers.
As the House and Senate pass bills, S&L will
continue
to post the bills that are of interest to our clients that
have been signed into law and become public acts
(PA) or special acts (SA), or vetoed, by Governor Rell.
For a list of bills passed, but not yet acted upon by the
Governor, please click the link below.
PA 07-11 (HB 5186) AN ACT CONCERNING THE
EVACUATION OF PETS AND SERVICE ANIMALS AND
APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL EMERGENCY PLAN OF
OPERATIONS
PA 07-18 (SB 229) AN ACT CONCERNING LISTS
OF PROVIDERS AND NOTIFICATION OF
TERMINATION OR WITHDRAWAL OF PRIMARY CARE
PHYSICIANS
PA 07-21 (SB 1212) AN ACT CONCERNING
COVERAGE BY THE CONNECTICUT INSURANCE
GUARANTY ASSOCIATION
|
|
State Representative Larry Butler |
|
|
|
State Representative Larry Butler was born and raised
in the town that he now represents: the 72nd
assembly district of Waterbury. Butler, a computer
software designer by trade, has been active in his
community for years. He served 4 terms as an
Alderman, served on the Democratic Town
Committee, and worked on a number of community
service projects. Finally, Butler decided it was time to
take his knowledge of his district to Hartford.
Butler said he found the transition to the legislature to
be an interesting one. He was pleasantly surprised
that it didn't take too long to get the hang of things at
the Capitol. Butler is a member of the Housing,
Human Services, and Finance Committees. He is
proud to say that many of the bills he worked on in his
committees, including affordable housing and health
care issues, are still alive and working their way
through the process.
As a member of the Finance Committee, Butler is well
versed on the budget and tax package proposals from
the Governor, Democrats, and Republicans. He
thinks the Governor's budget proposal focused too
much on education and cut other vital areas. For
instance, Butler said some agencies had their
budgets completely eliminated, and some healthcare
initiatives were zeroed out. He explained that the
Governor proposed to fund education at the expense
of other much need services.
Legislative leaders continue to negotiate a budget
proposal and Butler is glad to report that the House
Democrats propose to put back more money to
restore the services that were cut from the Governor's
proposal. However, as for the Republicans' budget
proposal, he feels that the Republicans based their
proposal on unrealistic revenues. "That's
dangerous," Butler said, "That's how deficits are built
in."
Now that the clock is beginning to wind down on
session (17 days and counting), Butler thinks the
supermajority may still come into play a couple
times. "I'm assuming the Governor will veto
something somewhere along the line," Butler said.
He continued that this would test whether the
Democrats could hold firm to their strength in
numbers.
Regardless of the supermajority and whatever issues
hit the floor, Butler is sure of one thing, "I will remain
steadfast in working on quality of life issues for my
district." He may be a freshman legislator, but Butler
seems to know how to best represent the folks "at
home base".
Butler
|
|